Death of 3D Movies

If you are a massive movie fan or not, there is no escape from the fact that 3D movies are big business at that time. As the number of studies that seek to capitalize on the moving train of a debate among the 3-D cinema, heated filmmakers and critics increasingly. There seems to be consensus about the merits of the film in 3D. Some may feel a fad, while others argue that it is the future of cinema. So, what do you think - is welcomed for more 3D, since it is already installed, or go on one of the pillars of our experience in the film to be?

Before proceeding, it ensures that we all agree on the kind of 3D, as we speak. We are not talking characters that caused a revolution in special effects during the 80s and early 90s. In this case we describe is based stereoscopic 3D technology, opposite from the illusion of depth of real images, as opposed to a "flat" image. This technology was relatively unknown films like Avatar, was released to the public's imagination. Although the film is relatively new, so it seems that all the films on the lookout for an angle that can benefit from stereoscopic 3D. Not to think that this technology is new since the first experiments in stereoscopic images began in early 1800, although granted, and has been refined over the past two decades, improved fool. It was now the point where the most influential filmmakers in Hollywood Animation Company called it as the future of cinema reached.

It seems that there are two sides in the current debate about 3D. Some people are skeptical about the benefits of 3D and insisted that this is a fad, because it was in the 80s, when it asks for a wave of films, the viewer, with the old style red and green 3D specifications. They also make the argument that the ticket prices for these films more viewers overall swollen film and many stay away and wait for a DVD release, as he prefers a more conventional - and less expensive in most cases - the experience of the traditional 2D display.

On the other side of the fence are those who have a declining interest in stereoscopic 3D films, film makers, who were the best of technology and those who had not used its best effect make up to get reduced. They also point out that if the filmmakers have put more emphasis on special effects, then it takes the focus of what distinguishes a great film with a film of the poor - an excellent story.

People with this view also accept that there are good 3D movies and bad movies and is very likely that these bad movies that contribute to the lack of interest.

However, it appears that 3D at least stay for a while. This technology is enough time to see if it will be good utilized we can only wait and see and be.